As El Salvador implements its first in the world, Bitcoin legal tender mandate, we should all take a step back and think about this. Cryptocurrency is being imposed on people by the same repressive methods that fiat was. Bitcoin, which is supposed to be an alternative to this top-down inflationary approach, is now being imposed through the same arbitrary system it was created to oppose. Should we be celebrating?
What is Legal Tender?
To understand where we are and why this topic elicits a more elaborate reaction than just a knee-jerk hurray, it is necessary to understand what legal tender means. Legal tender is:
- The form of money that MUST be accepted to pay for goods, services, or debt
- It is legally imposed currency
The Bitcoin Legal Tender Conundrum
Bitcoin was not intended to be legal tender. Quite the opposite: It rose from the fringe as an alternative that anyone is free to use or accept as they wish. Therefore, mandating a whole country to accept it as payment is at the very least a deviation from Bitcoin’s humble beginnings.
Hodlers and other enthusiasts should be at least weary that a currency created to maximize freedom, is now being imposed. Imposing freedom is an oxymoron.
El Salvador Makes Bitcoin Legal Tender
El Salvador is the first country to test this paradox. Its government made Bitcoin legal tender. From September 7th, 2021, businesses should be accepting BTC payments. There is already some evidence of Bitcoin purchases at establishments that do not take BTC payments elsewhere in the world.
As enthusiasts the world over look at El Salvador with awe, few are thinking about the country’s Bitcoin Law critically. Here are some problems with it that few have pointed out:
- Bitcoin must be accepted as payment by anyone who offers it according to article 7 – people and businesses in El Salvador have no freedom to decide whether or not to do business in BTC, at least according to the law
- Regardless of any solution that the private sector offers, the government will guarantee that BTC will be convertible to USD according to article 8 – El Salvador must then boost its reserves to make good on the promise
- Article 9 already gives the government a way out of its article 8 commitment – Article 9 says that the specifications of this convertibility mechanism will be specified in the norms that the government will enact – ostensibly some time in the future, without clarifying what those norms will be
- Article 14 stipulates that convertibility will be guaranteed by the government through a special fund controlled by El Salvador’s Development Bank – BANDESAL – which affirms that convertibility to USD will only be guaranteed through a government-controlled entity
It is Also Fair to Highlight the Positives!
These articles should elicit more criticism from anyone who uses Bitcoin. They represent the Bitcoin as legal tender oxymoron: all the pitfalls of imposing the use of better money on people who didn’t necessarily ask for it just because their elected representatives wanted to, are clear for everyone to see.
To be fair, it is also important to highlight the positives in El Salvador’s Bitcoin Law:
- Article 8 also stipulates that the state – government – will provide support for anyone who needs training and infrastructure to use Bitcoin
- There is also a vague exemption for those who might not be able – or willing, actually – to take Bitcoin payments in Article 12, which seems to be temporary
The Bitcoin Trojan Horse Theory
Despite the positive aspects of this law and assuming that the government has good intentions, it is difficult to get past the imposition. The paradox of Bitcoin as legal tender deepens when we take the position of some users around the world, into account.
This meme sums up that aspect of how Bitcoin as legal tender could undermine the inherent authoritarianism with which governments can impose the use of BTC as currency in any given country:
Governments – in this case dictators, which are an interesting choice for this meme – invite Bitcoin into their countries without knowing it is a Trojan Horse. In its belly, this Trojan Horse carries freedom soldiers.
Memes tend to oversimplify reality and by definition they should not be taken too seriously. Nevertheless, this one gives us an insight into the perils of oversimplifying thought when it comes to the forced adoption of BTC by making it legal tender.
Dictators Use Bitcoin to their Advantage
At this point it is important to establish that Nayib Bukele, the president of El Salvador who is responsible for the introduction of the Bitcoin Law in that country, is not a dictator. He was democratically elected and is taking advantage of his majority in the legislative branch to promote his agenda. In other words, he is as authoritarian as Trudeau, Biden, Johnson, or any other “Western” leader.
Those of us who sit in the so called “West” understand perfectly that authoritarianism in democratic clothing is not as bad as fully blown dictatorships, but it is pretty bad overall. “Western” governments have given Bitcoin relevance precisely due to their proclivity to cheat the system and get the central banks to print money endlessly to fund bloated spending. That becomes a de facto additional tax on their citizens via inflation.
The use of Bitcoin in the “West” did not make the countries themselves freer. In fact, governments have been taking more and more power through all types of emergency provisions despite Bitcoin. In some cases, draconian legislation puts “Western” BTC users in a tougher situation legally when it comes to declaring their taxes.
Bitcoin Use does not Equal Freedom
If Bitcoin failed to foster freedom in the countries that market themselves as free and have some semblance of respect for some individual rights, then the situation in countries ruled by dictators is worse. Take a look at any country where the dictatorship either allows or encourages the use of Bitcoin and you will understand:
- Iran – according to reports this country’s government uses cryptocurrency to avoid international sanctions
- North Korea – there are reports that point to government hackers stealing BTC to shore up the country’s foreign reserves
Chant ‘Libertad’ and go to Jail, but Use Bitcoin if you Want?
People living in these countries are not freer because they use Bitcoin or because their government does. In fact, the opposite might be true:
- Allowing people to use BTC may attenuate their hardship somehow, reinforcing the notion that the “West” with its sanctions is the problem
- It staves off total collapse, allowing dictators to keep on oppressing their people
Take Cuba as an example:
- The country has been under a Communist regime for about 61 years
- One of its greatest sources of foreign reserves – if not the greatest – is tourism
- Another important source of foreign reserves is its medical missions program – in which Cuba sends doctors to treat people in other countries for a payment made to the government
- Both of these sources of income have been hit due to the global health crisis
- Protests erupted in the country as a result of economic hardship this summer
- The government quickly shut them down by force
- Since the government controls the internet in the island, more recent footage of the protests is impossible to come by
- On August 27th, 2021, the Cuban government declared that it would regulate the use of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies in the country
- That came a few weeks after the protests started
To sum it all up: If you chant ‘libertad’ – freedom – in the streets of Havanna, the regime will arrest you. A few weeks later the government greenlights the use of Bitcoin, so now the freedom you cannot chant for will penetrate the island through decentralized digital money?
Shoring up International Reserves
In the case of Cuba, the intention to regulate cryptocurrencies and potentially make Bitcoin legal tender, looks like a ploy to make up for international reserves lost to a decline in tourism and medical missions. The government controls the internet and pretty much any other asset in the island. It is nearly impossible to assume that regulated use of Bitcoin in the island will come through a non-custodial wallet.
Cuba will most certainly launch its own custodial wallet for Cubans to use. Whatever happens on a P2P level with BTC in that country, will entail taking substantial risks. Therefore, it will not amount to much on the freedom scale.
Is El Salvador Looking to Shore up its Reserves as Well?
Despite the fact that the government in El Salvador is not nearly as authoritarian as the one in Cuba, there are some important similarities in the goals it is pursuing by making Bitcoin legal tender. It is likely that Bukele promoted the Bitcoin Law as a move to modernize his country and connect it to the world. The real goal could well be remittance control.
Consider the following:
- According to Article 8, convertibility to USD will be guaranteed by the government through its own infrastructure
- The Salvadorian government developed its own wallet called Chivo to comply with its obligation to provide infrastructure for transactions and possibly convertibility as stipulated by its Bitcoin Law
- Salvadorians got $30 USD worth of BTC on their Chivo wallets if they installed them on September 7th
- Remittances to El Salvador amount to about 24% of GDP according to The World Bank
- Those remittances come into the country via Western Union and other such services. It is hard to tax them
- Chivo will in theory allow Salvadorians to side-step Western Union and other such financial institutions, making remittances cheaper
- Nevertheless, if people use Chivo or if they want to guarantee convertibility, in practice, they must show the government their coins at some point
Therefore, it is entirely possible that while Nayib Bukele is not interested in shoring up reserves. He might be after revenue from remittances, just like the Cuban government. A government that has difficulties taxing about a quarter of its GDP will want to do everything to access that source of revenue. Of course, this is not proven yet, but it is possible especially given how the Bitcoin Law is written.
The That is Bitcoin’s Status as Legal Tender in El Salvador
If you are a Bitcoin enthusiast, you should be asking yourself if the fact that Bitcoin is now legal tender in El Salvador means that it will inevitably end up financing the government. The answer is yes. Whether through taxation of remittances or otherwise, the Salvadorian government will end up getting paid in BTC. Let us rephrase that for you:
A centralized authority that can impose the kind of currency used within the sovereign territory it controls, will end up getting paid and therefore accumulating reserves denominated in a decentralized currency that sees absolutely no use for intermediaries – like a Chivo wallet – or centralized authority – like a government.
Remember this when Bitcoin Becomes Legal Tender Elsewhere
Take a step back from EL Salvador and look at the bigger picture. Wherever there is a government that wants to make Bitcoin legal tender, you should at least stop and analyze thoroughly before you praise the move.
On the other hand, you should always keep in mind that Bitcoin is an agnostic tool. It can be used to oppress as much as it can be used to liberate. Salvadorians did not need a Bitcoin Law to free themselves from fiat; it was the government that needed the law. Be mindful of this important distinction and avoid the Bitcoin as legal tender knee jerk reaction for the sake of your own freedom.